Showing posts with label hongkong. Show all posts
Showing posts with label hongkong. Show all posts

Friday, 1 August 2008

The next generation urban park - The High Line in New York

With more and more people in the world living in cities, how could we create a new type of sustainable urban environment that not only demolish old buildings and dissect neighbourhoods for new construction?

There may be an answer laid in the High Line in New York. It is an elevated rail network on bridges spanning 22 blocks and 1.45 miles long through three of Manhattan's most dynamic neighborhoods: Hell's Kitchen/Hudson Yards, West Chelsea, and the Gansevoort Market Historic District. The railway line was used to transport goods from one side of the city to the other without disturbing street level traffic but was gradually declined after the 1950s.

the high line

Since the mid 1980s, a group of private property owners who purchased land under the High Line at prices that reflected its easement have lobbied for demolition of the entire structure. Much credit for the fact that the High Line survived the demolition efforts in the mid- and late 1980s goes to Peter Obletz, a Chelsea resident, activist, and railroad enthusiast, who challenged demolition efforts in court and tried to reestablish rail service on the Line. In 1999 Friends of the High Line (FHL) was founded by Joshua David and Robert Hammond to advocate for the High Line's preservation and reuse as public open space.

the high line

A design competition was hold in 2003. The final proposal to be constructed is being designed by Field Operations (landscape architects) and Diller Scofidio + Renfro (architects). It would create a fabulous stripe of public open space travelling through building blocks at an elevated level in a scale never realised before in the world. Such dynamic creation would inject much vibrancy in the local life of the neighbourhoods, liven up streets and bring another green dimension to the city.

the high line

Below is a 6 minute documentary made by the Friends of the High Line offering an overview of High Line, its history, the movement to save it, and designs for its reuse. Directed and produced by John Zieman -



Finally there is something which makes me really want to visit New York. Looking back to Hongkong, while we have 2 gigantic vacant plots next to the harbour - the West Kowloon and the Kai Tak, have we ever thought about how we could plan these spaces so that they would become a generator for the surrounding neighbourhoods as well? And for other urban regeneration projects, being overseen by the Urban Renewal Authority, who has the vision to not just focus on separate plots but to create strategic linkages across the neighbourhood like the Central-Mid-Levels Escalator to bring in another dimension to the city fabric?

Even for the proclaimed success of the Central-Mid-Levels Escalator, is there anybody living in the area thinking on further evolution of the escalator? Perhaps we could have a Central-Mid-Levels Escalator 2.0, which could be either introducing green spaces on top / bottom of the existing escalator, or onstructing green skywalks similar to the High Line connecting the various levels of life?

Or look at the pedestrain footbridge networks we have around Central and Wanchai. Could the government actually co-operate with the developers of nearby commercial buildings to refurbish them and integrate green features and plants fully with the footbridge so we could have some fluid park spaces across the city where everybody could have a rest or enjoy their commute? This additional density of green would not cause any negative impact on the existing infrastructure, but instead further enhance the cityscape.

Further reading -

official website - http://www.thehighline.org
photo gallery - http://www.flickr.com/photos/friendsofthehighline
design competition entries - http://www.thehighline.org/competition
similar projects around the world - http://www.thehighline.org/about/similarprojects.html
central-mid-levels escalator - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central-Mid-Levels_escalators

Sunday, 16 March 2008

how to run a green restaurant


Acorn House Restaurant features in 100% Design Show

首間環保海鮮餐廳上菜 響應WWF指引 以「環保海鮮」材料入餚

明報 2008年3月16日

【明報專訊】世界自然基金會(WWF)去年為保護海洋生態而推出的「海鮮選擇指引」,終獲首間餐廳響應。該餐廳目前推出7款選用「環保海鮮」為材料的菜式,並取消包括藍鰭吞拿等名菜。WWF承認,要食肆跟隨指引不是「開燈熄燈」般容易,但這個例子證明並非不可能,故會繼續向更多食肆推廣。

每款菜式售228至428元

成為首間跟隨「海鮮選擇指引」的是位於中環太子大廈的高級餐廳Dot Cod Seafood Restaurant & Oyster Bar,該餐廳市務及項目經理Wendy表示,該餐廳由去年10月開始籌備跟隨指引,包括要求海鮮供應商確保食物來自以環保方法飼養或捕撈的類別,並設計相應餐單。目前,該餐廳共有7款屬環保海鮮的菜式,包括來自阿拉斯加的三文魚、北美的銀鱈魚等,預計本月底再增加3款,每款菜式售228至428元不等。

北美銀鱈魚 曾一天售80碟

該餐廳的新菜式推出以來反應不俗,目前有近半數顧客食用,更曾在一天內售出80碟北美捕撈銀鱈魚製作的菜式。她說,已向WWF表明無法即時完全跟隨指引,但會逐漸跟隨,早前已將金獅魚、藍鰭吞拿魚及紅斑等3款被列為「避免食用」的海鮮剔走。她坦言,這些是餐廳的「招牌菜」之一,「不時仍有顧客會查問」,目前餐牌上並沒有指引中建議「避免食用」的海鮮提供。

WWF於去年3月推出有關指引,將60多款海鮮,按其現有數目、飼養或捕撈方法等,分成「建議」、「想清楚」及「避免」3個食用類別。

推出一年 首間響應

對於指引推出近1年才有首間食肆響應,WWF高級環境保護主任 (海洋環保)朱炳盛承認,要食肆改變並不容易,但證明並非不可行。他說,建議食用的海鮮無論在價錢及味道上,與避免食用的海鮮並沒太大差別,只是食肆習慣了以往的做法,不願意改變,該會將繼續向不同的中西式食肆推廣。

________________________________________________

today's green lime - see how acorn house restaurant in london practise eco-friendly dining http://www.acornhouserestaurant.com/

Monday, 25 February 2008

'wasted' management

家居廢物收費 2010年前難實行
extracted from 明報 . 26.02.2008

【明報專訊】政府的減廢大計嚴重延誤,環保署長王倩儀承認,本港家居廢物難以按量收費,今年中開始會進行12至18個月的大型基線調查,完成後進行公眾諮詢,暫未能訂下落實推行收費的時間表。換言之,家居廢物收費不會在2010年前實行。

「按量收費」失敗而回

對於政府明確指出,本港首個焚化爐將於2014年投入服務,地球之友及立法會議員蔡素玉均批評,未做好源頭分類便焚燒廢物,只會浪費大量有用資源,是減廢政策的大倒退。

王倩儀昨出席立法會環境事務委員會,交代去年完成的家居廢物按量收費試驗計劃,結果顯示追查每戶生產廢物的源頭有困難,因此難以執行按量收費。

政府將於今年下半年重新展開一項基線調查,為期12至18個月,研究以劃一或定額方式徵費,初步構思以水費或差餉單評估每戶產生的廢物量及收費水平。她說,新加坡目前亦是以劃一方式收費,台北最初亦是以該方式收費,到市民適應後,才轉為按量收費。

議員批評減廢政策倒退

環境局長邱騰華強調,政府沒有忽略源頭減廢工作,強調徵費方式必須切實可行,試驗結果既顯示難以按量收費,因此要重新研究。他又指落實興建焚化爐需時,目前提出是合適時間。民建聯蔡素玉批評政府的減廢政策大倒退,認為以焚化爐「一燒了之」不能解決問題,民主黨李柱銘批評政府議而不決,推行收費無期。

政府早前公布,新一代焚化爐將於2014年運作,議員普遍關注選址對周圍環境及居民的影響。民建聯劉江華形容,本港擬興建的焚化爐「萬佛朝宗」,容量高達 3000公噸,與日本分散在各區的小型焚化爐不同,而該區亦有其他大型設施如電廠及堆填區等,擔心影響香港的空氣質素。環保署回應稱,目前科技可以將焚化過程產生的致癌物二噁英維持在極低水平,遠低於歐盟標準,不會對周圍居民有任何影響。

焚化爐計劃亦引起財團注意,青洲英坭執行董事莊善敦昨日親自到立法會旁聽,會後透露今日與環保署代表會面,建議採用該集團的「環保廢物融化系統」,將焚化爐設於英坭廠內,毋須額外撥出土地,較其他選址更環保及具成本效益。

-----

today's green lime -
SMIT's GROW: Solar and Wind Leaf Photovoltaic Shingles
http://www.inhabitat.com/2008/03/01/smits-grow2-project-new-solar-and-wind-solutions/

Monday, 12 November 2007

members of parliament to act as role models for green energy


The UK Parliament in Westminster on the north bank of Thames (right)
____________________________________________________________________

The londonpaper today reports that the UK parliament are studying how to run the parliament building by more sustainable energy and reduce its carbon footprint. The following is an extract of the article by Widiane Moussa -

£20m Plan to Cut Emissions
Winds of Change for Westminster


Parliament could be powered by wind turbines & tides in a bid to cut its carbon footprint by almost a third. The Palace of Westminster uses enough electricity to power 6500 households & it would take a forest of more than 2500 trees to soak up the C02 output. Its environmental impact including 2252 tonnes of rubbish has angered MPs who want to improve freen creditials.

A study into the greening of the parliamentary estate commissioned by MPs shows how the buildings could be partly powered by a 35m-high wind turbine on the neighbouring Victoria Gardens & a field of tidal turbines in the Thames, next to the members' terraces. Double glazing could be fitted to draughty windows & officials are even toying with the idea of installing miniature power stations in the cellars, which will take the palace partly "off-grids".

According to the plans, obtained under the Freedom of Information Act, the project will cost at least £20 million. "We can't afford to do nothing and tha is exactly what Parliament has done for too long" said Norman Baker, Liberal Democrat MP for Lewes, who has calculated that electricity consumption in the Commons has risen 86% since 1997.

-END-
______________________________________________________________________

What has our honourable Legislative Councillors in Hongkong done on their new home in Tamar? Have they really carried out studies on the energy consumption of the existing monumental LegCo building or ask the government to set reduction target for the new LegCo building? If the Thames could have tidal turbines to generate electricity, Tamar could have tubrines in Victoria Harbour to do the same.

It is time we demand these councillors to really work their bit to get their salary review justified.

today's fresh lime -

A video showing the technology of tidal turbines for next generation energy source -
http://video.on.nytimes.com/?fr_story=a16561a2d9322a0e5953813fd7c930aa6fd8e41e

Wednesday, 12 September 2007

Q: Why we become the city which "its air is so bad"?

Dear people in HK,

Have you ever thought about the answer of the question above? That why the western media keep saying the air is so polluted in Hongkong, why the air in downtown Mong Kok or Causeway Bay is always more polluted than the air in downtown Tuen Mun or Yuen Long, why we have fewer & fewer days with blue sky every year despite measures such as conversion of taxi from petrol-run to LPG-run.... etc?

Something must be wrong in our own city, not to blame our mainland neighbour all the time. In fact Shenzhen has strived to become a "green city" in true scale & sense.

So could you just give some thoughts to the question - and let me know the answer!